Skip to main content
· 7/15/2004

LaRoche Industries, Inc. v. Orica Nitrogen LLC (In Re LaRoche Industries, Inc.)

Citations

  • 312 B.R. 249
  • 52 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 799
  • 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 999
  • 43 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 96
  • 2004 WL 1638073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contract dispute, where no provision of the Bankruptcy Code is implicated, is governed by state law
  • stating that a majority of courts hold that a post-petition breach of contract action is a core proceeding
  • finding that permissive abstention was appropriate even though the claims were core
  • “[T]he fact that [the relevant party] ignored the agreement ... should not be counted in its favor.”
  • “This Court is tremendously overburdened. This action will unnecessarily add to that burden.”
  • “[T]his Court is tremendously overburdened. This action will unnecessarily add to that burden.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary F. Walrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.