LaRocca v. Xerox Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting employer’s motion for summary judgment where the policy at issue lacked any language “expressly providing that the manual is to constitute a separate employment contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hinson v. Cameron
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1987-06-09· cited 138×
• Barger v. General Electric Co.
  W.D. Virginia· 1984-11-19· cited 38×
• Quaker Oats Co. v. Jewell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-28· cited 20×
• Linafelt v. Bev, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-03· cited 15×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 786×
• Muller v. Stromberg Carlson Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-16· cited 72×
• DeMarco v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-06-27· cited 61×
• Chastain v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-06-07· cited 14×
• White v. I.T.T.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-10-31· cited 11×
• Glen Whitfield v. Ira Finn, as Chief of Police of the City of Childersburg, Alabama, Ivan R. Smith
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-05-10· cited 10×
• Forde v. Royal's, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 1982-04-30· cited 9×