Larkin v. Washington Loan & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the parties agreed, and the court assumed, that plaintiff's claims for benefits under an employee stock option plan were governed by state law
• “Internal Revenue Code 27 provisions and Treasury regulations do not create substantive rights under ERISA . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).