Skip to main content
· 12/9/2022

LARISSA WALN V. DYSART SCHOOL DISTRICT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it is “a clear abuse of discretion to accord this factor any weight” where the plaintiff “is not engaged in product competition in the marketplace”
  • holding it is “a clear abuse of discretion to accord this factor any weight” where the plaintiff “is not engaged in product competition in the marketplace”
  • noting the patented technology was invented in, and the patents prosecuted from, the transferee district and the accused products were developed in that district
  • weighing location of prosecuting attorneys in favor of transfer
  • weighing location of inventors in favor of transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.