· 12/9/2022
LARISSA WALN V. DYSART SCHOOL DISTRICT
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding it is “a clear abuse of discretion to accord this factor any weight” where the plaintiff “is not engaged in product competition in the marketplace”
- holding it is “a clear abuse of discretion to accord this factor any weight” where the plaintiff “is not engaged in product competition in the marketplace”
- noting the patented technology was invented in, and the patents prosecuted from, the transferee district and the accused products were developed in that district
- weighing location of prosecuting attorneys in favor of transfer
- weighing location of inventors in favor of transfer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.