Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2/10/1997

Larimore v. State

Citations

938 S.W.2d 818
327 Ark. 271
1997 Ark. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

the court, relying upon Morgan, held that coram nobis was available to challenge a conviction on the ground that the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence
“As the trial court considers whether to grant the writ, the following guidelines are applicable ... (4) Due diligence is required in making an application for relief, and, in the absence of a valid excuse for delay, the petition will be denied.”
“As the trial court considers whether to grant the writ, the following guidelines are applicable ... Due diligence is required in making an application for relief, and, in the absence of a valid excuse for delay, the petition will be denied.”
“As the trial court considers whether to grant the writ, the following guidelines are applicable . . . Due diligence is required in making an application for relief, and, in the absence of a valid excuse for delay, the petition will be denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornton, Glaze, Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.