Larimore v. Blaylock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[c]ommunications between persons on a subject in which the persons have an interest or duty are occasions of privilege.”
• noting that Virginia courts have applied the privilege “in a number of cases involving defamatory statements made between co-employees and employers in the course of employee disciplinary or discharge matters”
• “We have applied the doctrine of qualified privilege in a number of cases involving defamatory statements made between co-employees and employers in the course of employee disciplinary or discharge matters.
• “We have applied the doctrine of qualified privilege in a number of cases involving defamatory statements made between co-employees and employers in the course of employee disciplinary or discharge matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).