Larido v. Perkins

Citations

• 10 Teiss. 19
• 132 La. 660
• 1912 La. App. LEXIS 103

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. Plaintiff’s answer to interrogatories as to the verbal sale of an immovable propounded to him under Art. 2275, B. C. G., being adverse' to defendant’s claim, it'follows that the latter has not- and has never had any title to the property.</p> <p>2. Being without title, defendant was not a bona fide possessor ■ and he must return the fruits to the owner who claims them.</p> <p>3. The plaintiff, having elected not to retain the improvements, cannot be held for their value, but he must refund th.e taxes paid by the possessor. ’ ^</p>