Larger v. Allen Cty. Bd. of Revision

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendants had challenged six jurors for cause, used peremptory challenges to excuse five of those jurors, and did not use “any of the remaining seven peremptory challenges allowed them by statute” to excuse the other juror that they had challenged for cause
• noting that the defendants had challenged six jurors for cause, used peremptory challenges to excuse five of those jurors, and did not use “any of the remaining seven peremptory challenges allowed them by statute” to excuse the other juror that they had challenged for cause
• “It is well settled that, although the court sit- ting in the trial of the cause may have erred in overruling a challenge for cause, yet the error is cured by the exercise of a peremptory challenge against the juror in question.”
• “It is well settled that, although the court sit- ting in the trial of the cause may have erred in overruling a challenge for cause, yet the error is cured by the exercise of a peremptory challenge against the juror in question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).