Lareau v. O'Nan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring defendant to show “very serious inequit[y]” before considering a restrictive covenant to be contrary to public policy
• \[T]he policy of this state is to enforce [non-competition clauses] unless very serious inequities would result.\
• “the damages the clinic might suffer…though intangible, are sufficient to justify invoking the injunctive powers of the courts…there is no adequate remedy at law.”
• physician could practice anywhere in nation but Henderson County, Kentucky
• citation and internal 681 (Ky. 1962) (“[T]he policy of this state is to enforce quotation marks omitted). We find no such strong showing, [noncompetition clauses] unless very serious inequities would or indeed any showing at all, in the case before us. result.”
• distinguishing Calhoun v. Everman, 242 S.W.2d 100 (Ky.1951

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).