Larch v. Larch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discrepancies in non-party witness’s deposition testimony didn’t create issues of fact precluding summary judgment because “the discrepancies . . . all ha[d] to do with collateral issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).