Laraia v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying certification of meal period claims on predominance grounds because an individualized inquiry would be required to determine whether the employer impeded, discouraged or prohibited breaks or whether employees waived the break
• finding commonality met where plaintiff raised common question of whether 7 defendant’s alleged practices constituted violations of California wage and hour laws and “at least 8 some of the [relevant] facts to be analyzed . . . [were] the same”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).