Larach v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that fact-intensive inquiries, such as whether plaintiffs have alleged facts establishing that an agency relationship existed, are inappropriate for consideration at the motion to dismiss stage
• denying a motion to dismiss because the activity at issue was securities brokering
• determination of whether an agency relationship exists is fact-intensive and not properly resolved at the motion to dismiss stage
• “The parties’ differing interpretations of their respective obligations under the pledge agreement demonstrate that this issue is not ripe for decision at the motion to dismiss stage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).