Lara K. v. Dwight K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Nebraska’s statutory damages cap does not violate the Seventh Amendment
• explaining that a “rational basis for equal protection purposes also satisfies substantive due process analysis” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• rejecting Seventh Amendment challenge to Nebraska’s cap on medical malpractice damages
• “[W]e are free to affirm on any ground sup- ported by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).