L.A.R. v. Ludwig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that immunity does not apply to “negligence claims based on improper treatment”
• noting that the statute’s purpose is to require “professionals who work with children to report instances of suspected child abuse”
• noting that the reporter does not need to gather facts to establish that abuse actually exists
• noting the “strong policy reasons” embodied in § 13-3620(A) require “professionals who work with children to report instances of suspected child abuse”
• whether statute creates testimonial privilege for clergy independent of penitent’s consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).