Skip to main content
· 9/11/1984

LaPuma v. State

Citations

  • 456 So. 2d 933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where prior determination made that defendant competent to stand trial and no circumstances changed defendant's condition, not abuse of discretion for trial court to refuse to hold additional competency determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Baskin and Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.