LaPrade, Linda E. v. Kidder Peabody & Co

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that arbitration assessment of fees for arbitration of non-statutory claims would not be subject to Cole
• stating that arbitration is not required to be cost-free for the plaintiff, just as litigating in court would not be
• assuming that arbitration assessment of fees for arbitration of non-statutory claims would not be subject to Cole
• stating that to prevail under the “manifest disregard of the law” standard, the party seeking to vacate must demonstrate “more than error or misunderstanding with respect to the law”
• stating that “a court must confirm an arbitration award where some colorable support for the award can be gleaned (. . . continued) encompassed within the grounds explicitly listed under the FAA (specifically Sections 10(a)(3) and (4)
• explaining that “[m]Janifest disregard . . . is an extremely narrow standard of review” that “means much more than failure to apply the correct law:” “to vacate an award under that standard, we must find that (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).