Skip to main content
· 1/15/1918

Lapp v. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co.

Citations

  • 178 Ky. 647
  • 199 S.W. 798
  • 1918 Ky. LEXIS 441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding sufficient verification where the debt collector sent a detailed statement explaining the charges underlying the debt
  • examining the Statement of Deposit and Resident Ledger Detail Report and determining the debts listed on these documents, aside from the thirty-day notice fee, were supported by the record
  • setting forth the factual background' and earlier procedural history
  • setting forth the factual background and earlier procedural history
  • “[T]he Supreme Court [in Jerman II] did not reach the question of whether mistakes of state or contract law are similarly outside the scope of the bona fide error defense. The Court sees no reason why such mistakes should not be covered by the defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.