Skip to main content
· 4/18/2005

LaPonte v. Dunn

Citations

  • 17 A.D.3d 539
  • 793 N.Y.S.2d 493
  • 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The claims for unjust enrichment and money had and received are not viable because express contracts govern the same subject matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.