First Circuit· 6/12/2019
Lapointe v. Silko Motor Sales, Inc.
Citations
- 926 F.3d 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- one \hired to remedy a hazard would reasonably be expected to exercise a different level of 'minimum care' concerning the danger than an individual who entered the property for a different reason and was unaware of the risk\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Lynch, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Maria De Los Angeles SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos ALVARADO, Et Al., Defendants, AppelleesFirst Circuit· 1996-12-30· cited 400×
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-01-10· cited 237×
- Cherkaoui v. City of QuincyFirst Circuit· 2017-12-04· cited 235×
- O'Sullivan v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-04-13· cited 146×
- Rivera-Rivera v. Medina & Medina, Inc.First Circuit· 2018-08-01· cited 135×
- Lyon v. MorphewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-05-05· cited 58×
- Callahan v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-07-07· cited 12×
Other cases named Lapointe v. Silko Motor Sales, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.