Lapkin v. Garland Bloodworth, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that under Oklahoma law, the basis of an unjust enrichment claim is that “in a given situation it is contrary to equity and good conscience for one to retain a benefit which has come to him at the expense of another”
• “This court has held that an express contract between parties does not preclude recission and a finding of unjust enrichment where equity demands such a result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).