Lapinad v. Pacific Oldsmobile-GMC, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[s]exually harassing behavior is outrageous\
• recognizing that ”[s]exually harassing behavior is outrageous”
• stating that an employer must have engaged in conduct beyond merely firing an employee for unfair reasons in order for the conduct to possibly be considered outrageous
• stating that an employer must have engaged in conduct beyond merely firing an employee for unfair reasons in order for the conduct to possibly be considered outrageous
• determining that defendant’s delay in disclosing error in drug test could be considered outrageous
• “Thus, even though Title VII is not an exclusive remedy, in that it does not abrogate remedies which already existed, it does not create an additional common law remedy beyond the specific remedies contained in the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).