Lapierre v. Federated Plans, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the best way to determine whether a party’s actions are in anticipation of litigation is a case-by-case analysis, considering the unique factual context of the given problem”
• “Certainly by implication the ... rule precludes any idea of extending the work product doctrine to reports or statements, even if written, obtained by the client or his investigators which are not prepared under the supervision of an attorney in preparation for trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).