Skip to main content
· 4/2/1982

Lapierre v. Cabral

Citations

  • 122 N.H. 301
  • 444 A.2d 522
  • 1982 N.H. LEXIS 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, absent indications the parties intended a writing to be the full agreement among themselves, the existence of a writing does not itself preclude additional terms to the contract
  • holding that, absent indications the parties intended a writing to be the full agreement among themselves, the existence of a writing does not itself preclude additional terms to 14 the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.