· 8/25/2009
Laouane v. Holder
Citations
- 343 F. App'x 679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Court concludes there is no per se prohibition on the suggested plan modification. This Court thus respectfully disagrees with the conclusion announced in Nolan and its progeny.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katzmann, Miner, Wesley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.