Skip to main content
· 8/25/2009

Laouane v. Holder

Citations

  • 343 F. App'x 679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Court concludes there is no per se prohibition on the suggested plan modification. This Court thus respectfully disagrees with the conclusion announced in Nolan and its progeny.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katzmann, Miner, Wesley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.