· 3/5/2010
Lanuza v. Holder
Citations
- 597 F.3d 970
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4702
- 2010 WL 744710
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no due process violation when “the IJ reviewed all the record evidence, heard counsel’s arguments and [the petitioner’s] testimony, [and] allowed cross-examination”
- the IIRIRA “expressly precludes” review of eligibility decisions under NACARA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wardlaw, Callahan, Sedwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.