Skip to main content
· 3/5/2010

Lanuza v. Holder

Citations

  • 597 F.3d 970
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4702
  • 2010 WL 744710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no due process violation when “the IJ reviewed all the record evidence, heard counsel’s arguments and [the petitioner’s] testimony, [and] allowed cross-examination”
  • the IIRIRA “expressly precludes” review of eligibility decisions under NACARA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wardlaw, Callahan, Sedwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.