Lantz ex rel. Lantz v. Ambach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that res judicata “prevents the relitigation of all matters that were or should have been adjudicated in the prior action”
• noting res judicata \bars every ground of recovery ... which was actually presented or which could have been presented in the previous action\
• assessing the application of the Lassiter exception to Peabody by virtue of her ownership of Peabody's Home Improvements, Inc., a party to a prior lawsuit
• discussing elements that must be shown by party asserting res judicata
• “The defense of res judicata may not be avoided by shifting legal theories or asserting a new or different ground for relief.” (citation omitted)
• for purposes of collateral estoppel, for an issue to be actually litigated it must “be in fact determined”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).