Lanterman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the best interest of the child is a paramount consideration in determining whether to order blood tests
• recognizing that the best interest of the child is a paramount consideration in determining whether to order blood tests
• emphasizing that person must be “biological or adoptive [parent]” or “ ‘legal guardian’ ” to have standing to pursue habeas corpus proceeding for child custody
• relying on Swift in concluding that writ of habeas corpus is proper procedural vehicle with which to challenge custody of child at common law
• relying on Swift in concluding that writ of habeas corpus is proper procedural vehicle with which to challenge custody of child at common law
• permitting putative biological father to maintain standing for habeas action seeking custody and visitation of minor child bom to mother while married to another man

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).