Lansford v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that on appeal from a grant of summary judgment an appellant may not advance new theories or raise new issues
• holding that on appeal from a grant of summary judgment an appellant may not advance new theories or raise new issues
• stating that “a claim must be mature to be compulsory” 16 and a claim that is not mature is not “subject to res judicata principles” (quotation omitted)
• refusing to consider argument on appeal when this court could not find any instance where argument was made in the trial court
• rejecting the assertion that the plaintiff's malpractice action was barred by the statute of limitations and holding instead that the plaintiff's claim had not accrued until the underlying adversary bankruptcy litigation was resolved on appeal
• rejecting the assertion that the plaintiffs malpractice action was barred by the statute of limitations and holding instead that the plaintiffs claim had not accrued until the underlying adversary bankruptcy litigation was resolved on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).