Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/20/1992

Lansford v. Harris

Citations

850 P.2d 126
174 Ariz. 413
124 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 21
1992 Ariz. App. LEXIS 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that on appeal from a grant of summary judgment an appellant may not advance new theories or raise new issues
holding that on appeal from a grant of summary judgment an appellant may not advance new theories or raise new issues
stating that “a claim must be mature to be compulsory” 16 and a claim that is not mature is not “subject to res judicata principles” (quotation omitted)
refusing to consider argument on appeal when this court could not find any instance where argument was made in the trial court
rejecting the assertion that the plaintiff's malpractice action was barred by the statute of limitations and holding instead that the plaintiff's claim had not accrued until the underlying adversary bankruptcy litigation was resolved on appeal
rejecting the assertion that the plaintiffs malpractice action was barred by the statute of limitations and holding instead that the plaintiffs claim had not accrued until the underlying adversary bankruptcy litigation was resolved on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Lankford, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.