Lanning v. Virginia Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “bald assertion” is not enough to prove causation nor are “talismanic words” necessary
• claimant performed only light house work and did not knit, garden or work with hand tools
• “In order for us to review a decision of the [C]ommission, the [C]ommission must make a finding, even if the deputy commissioner previously made a factual ruling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).