Skip to main content
· 5/21/1986

Lanning v. City of Monterey

Citations

  • 181 Cal. App. 3d 352
  • 226 Cal. Rptr. 258
  • 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • city’s acquisition of real property through purchase in lieu of its exercise of power of eminent domain was “essential equivalent” of exercise of eminent domain.
  • “A 6 libel which is defamatory of the plaintiff without the necessity of explanatory matter, 7 such as inducement, innuendo or other extrinsic fact is said to be a libel on its face.”
  • “A 6 libel which is defamatory of the plaintiff without the necessity of explanatory matter, 7 such as inducement, innuendo or other extrinsic fact is said to be a libel on its face.”
  • “A 6 libel which is defamatory of the plaintiff without the necessity of explanatory matter, 7 such as inducement, innuendo or other extrinsic fact is said to be a libel on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agliano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.