Lanman v. Johnson County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the ADA’s “terms, conditions, and privileges of employment” language was borrowed from Title VII and should mean the same in both statutory contexts
• joining three other circuits in holding that the ADA’s incorporation of language from Title VII shows Congress’s intent to allow hostile-work-environment claims to proceed under the ADA
• stating that Congress borrowed the ADA language from Title VII
• “The parallel purposes and remedial structures of the two statutes also support a consistent interpretation.”
• “[W]e hold that a hostile work environment claim is actionable under the ADA.”
• “Personality conflicts among coworkers (even those expressed through the use (or misuse) of mental health terminology) generally do not establish a perceived impairment on the part of the employer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).