Lanier v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Jurors are entitled to use their own common sense as intelligent human beings on many questions.”
• “Jurors are entitled to use their own common sense as intelligent human beings on many questions.”
• “Jurors are entitled to use their own common sense as intelligent human beings on many questions.” (punctuation omitted)
• exhibit introduced but not expressly admitted into evidence was \tacitly admitted\ by trial court
• exhibit introduced but not expressly admitted into evidence was “tacitly admitted” by trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-09-22· cited 20×
• Weyer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-08-06· cited 11×
• BARBER v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-05-08· cited 5×
• Moran v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-08-30· cited 4×
• Jamie Lee Weyer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-08-10
• Reynaldo Alvarez-Maldonado v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-02
• Jarvis Barber v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-05-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Feldschneider v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1972-11-15· cited 28×
• Shannon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-10-09· cited 14×
• Hite v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-03-12· cited 11×
• Hassan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-31· cited 7×
• Apperson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-17· cited 7×