Lanier v. Lanier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in contested marriage dissolution proceedings the trial court is required to enter written findings of fact identifying and valuing marital assets
• holding that an order awarding a party “sole custody and care of the minor children” was vague as to whether the court intended to award the party sole parental responsibility
• noting that written findings of fact identifying and valuing marital assets are necessary so that “the parties or reviewing court may discern the rationale for the distribution scheme employed”
• reversing in part and remanding for \the trial court to clarify its order regarding the parental responsibility and custody of the children\
• reversing in part and remanding for \the trial court to clarify its order regarding the parental responsibility and custody of the children\
• reversing in part and remanding for \the trial court to clarify its order regarding the parental responsibility and custody of the children\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mills v. Mills
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-06· cited 2×
• E. v. v. D. M. v. H.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-29
• HEATHER RAMIREZ v. ANTHONY RAMIREZ
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-03-18

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Staton v. Staton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-22· cited 20×
• Pignataro v. Rutledge
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-04· cited 8×