Skip to main content

Lanier v. Lanier

Citations

  • 126 S.E.2d 776
  • 218 Ga. 137
  • 1962 Ga. LEXIS 455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding in terrorem clause which provided that if a beneficiary violated the clause, such beneficiary's bequest \`shall be revoked and rescinded and the share of such beneficiary shall go pro rata to the remaining beneficiaries'\
  • rejecting the plaintiff’s contention that a will was invalid because it violated the rule against perpetuities and then concluding that the plaintiff had forfeited his inheritance under an in terrorem clause contained in the will
  • upholding in terrorem clause which provided that if a beneficiary violated the clause, such beneficiary’s bequest “ ‘shall be revoked and rescinded and the share of such beneficiary shall go pro rata to the remaining beneficiaries’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Almand, Duckworth, Candler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.