· 6/19/1990
Lani Moore v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 907 F.2d 165
- 285 U.S. App. D.C. 95
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9809
- 59 U.S.L.W. 2005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that attorney’s fees may be awarded to a prevailing party at an administrative hearing
- distinguishing between civil actions in federal court and administrative proceedings and finding that Congress intended to authorize fees for prevailing parties in both types of proceedings
- Carey dealt with whether a party can recover fees incurred in necessary state administrative proceedings
- Carey dealt with whether a party can recover fees incurred in necessary state administrative proceedings
- “[T]he text and structure of [IDEA] directly support the inference that Congress intended section 1415(e)(4) to provide an independent cause of action for fees.” (emphasis added)
- “We begin, as we must, with an examination of the statutory text.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wald, Mikya, Edwards, Ginsburg, Silberman, Buckley, Williams, Sentelle, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.