Skip to main content
· 6/19/1990

Lani Moore v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 907 F.2d 165
  • 285 U.S. App. D.C. 95
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9809
  • 59 U.S.L.W. 2005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorney’s fees may be awarded to a prevailing party at an administrative hearing
  • distinguishing between civil actions in federal court and administrative proceedings and finding that Congress intended to authorize fees for prevailing parties in both types of proceedings
  • Carey dealt with whether a party can recover fees incurred in necessary state administrative proceedings
  • Carey dealt with whether a party can recover fees incurred in necessary state administrative proceedings
  • “[T]he text and structure of [IDEA] directly support the inference that Congress intended section 1415(e)(4) to provide an independent cause of action for fees.” (emphasis added)
  • “We begin, as we must, with an examination of the statutory text.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Mikya, Edwards, Ginsburg, Silberman, Buckley, Williams, Sentelle, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.