Skip to main content
· 3/30/1994

Langston v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles

Citations

  • 871 P.2d 362
  • 110 Nev. 342
  • 1994 Nev. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a case that turns on unique facts does not fall within the capable-of-repetition-yet evading review exception to mootness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.