Langston v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] conviction based on speculation and surmise alone cannot stand . . . .”
• “[A] conviction based on speculation and surmise alone cannot stand, and courts cannot credit inferences within the realm of possibility when those inferences are unreasonable” (internal citations and quotations marks omitted)
• noting distinction between \reasonable speculation\ and \sufficient evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).