· 1/15/1909
Langston v. National China Co.
Citations
- 57 Fla. 92
Syllabus
<p>In an action of assumpsit it is not error to exclude a merely preliminary question as to whether or not the plaintiff prior to the execution of the contract offered to defendants any verbal inducement to enter into the contract, where fraud is not pleaded and where there is no indication as to the purpose of the preliminary question excluded.</p>
Judges: Account, Illness, Parkhill, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.