Langston v. Act

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that designing and administering a test relied on by public institutions did not render the defendant a state actor
• noting that' the fact that public institutions rely on the ACT to evaluate students for admissions did not make the defendant a state actor under the public function test
• “The Supreme Court has emphasized that a mere showing that a private person performs a public function is not enough to establish state action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).