Langley v. Pinkerton's Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prescriptive period for plaintiffs whistleblower claim began to run on the date of her termination, as that was date on which the injury or damage was sustained
• definitions of La. R.S. 23:302 apply to La. R.S. 23:967 regardless of the fact that section 967 is found in chapter 9 of title 23, collecting “miscellaneous provisions,” rather than in chapter 3-A, which addresses “prohibited discrimination in employment”
• approving ’s holding in dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).