Langley v. National Labor Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that statements in affidavit were inadmissible hearsay because, “although reciting that it was made upon personal knowledge, the affidavit does not reflect that [affiant] was present in the context of the facts”
• finding that statements in affidavit were inadmissible hearsay because, “although reciting that it was made upon personal knowledge, the affidavit does not reflect that [affiant] was present in the context of the facts”
• “[A] defendant may only assert a counterclaim under OCGA § 13-6-11 if it has a viable independent counterclaim[.]”
• “[Testimony that] simply repeat[s] hearsay [is] not based on personal knowledge and ha[s] no probative value. As such, [it is] inadmissible in summary judgment proceedings.”
• “If it appears that any portion of the affidavit was not made upon the affiant’s personal knowledge, or if it does not affirmatively appear that it was so made, that portion is to be disregarded in considering the affidavit in connection with the motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).