Langley v. Napolitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the standards for review are the same” on a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) and on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)
• noting that \the standards for review are the same\ on a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) and on motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)
• construing motion for judgment on pleadings as motion for summary judgment when both parties submitted statements of material facts because plaintiff “had a reasonable opportunity to respond to the attached materials”
• construing motion for judgment on the pleadings and, in the alternative, for summary judgment, as a motion for summary judgment where motion attached exhibits that both parties relied on but were not included in the complaint
• construing motion for judgment on the pleadings and, in the alternative, for summary judgment, as a motion for summary judgment where motion attached exhibits that both parties relied on but were not included in the complaint
• where, as here, a significant factual record existed, construing untimely Rule 12(b)(6) arguments as summary judgment arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).