Skip to main content
· 5/12/1998

Langley v. Johnson

Citations

  • 499 S.E.2d 15
  • 27 Va. App. 365
  • 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “Gayler turned on the fact that the addendum's alteration of the original support provisions was a 'critical change in the original agreement,’ which necessarily evinced in a clear and express fashion the parties’ intent that the support would continue after remarriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Coleman, Bumgardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.