Skip to main content
· 1/21/1971

Langley v. Home Indemnity Company

Citations

  • 272 A.2d 740
  • 1971 Me. LEXIS 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statute could not be applied retroactively; “To hold a law operating with such drastic impact . . . to be merely ‘remedial’ in character and effect would be to lose focus upon reality in the obscurity of semantic fog.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dufresne, Web-Ber, Weatherbee, Pomeroy, Wernick, Marden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.