Langley v. Connecticut

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing directed verdict and holding that plaintiffs knowledge of a similar lawsuit against the named defendants did not necessarily constitute actual or constructive knowledge as a matter of law
• finding affirmative acts where defendant attributed price uniformity to competition, rather than collusion
• jury question existed as to whether plaintiff \exercised the requisite diligence\ in attempting to discover operative facts of alleged price-fixing conspiracy
• “[Courts should apply the relation back doctrine of [Federal] Rule 15(c) liberally.”
• “To establish fraudulent concealment, [Plaintiff! must prove (1) [Defendant] fraudulently concealed the conspiracy, (2) [Plaintiff] did not discover the facts which form the basis of the claim, and (3) [Plaintiff] exercised due diligence in attempting to discover the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).