Langham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that admission of out-of-court statements was not harmful error under Rule 44.2(a), in part, because statements “were cumulative of other evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Daniel Michael Athens v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2021-07-30
• Frank Estrada, III v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2026-04-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Neal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-18· cited 903×
• Langham v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-03-03· cited 299×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-11-05· cited 292×
• Clay v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-11-21· cited 236×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-06· cited 218×
• Langham v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2008-09-25· cited 12×