Skip to main content
· 1/10/1919

Langford v. Pringle

Citations

  • 105 Wash. 277
  • 177 P. 731
  • 1919 Wash. LEXIS 551

Syllabus

<p>Attorney and Client (44)—Compensation—Performance of Service—Evidence—Sufficiency. In an action to recover attorney’s fees agreed to be paid in the sum allowed by the court for the foreclosure of mortgages, evidence to the effect that the mortgagee was to be given a little time in case he was compelled to bid in the property, does not warrant denial of recovery for the full amount.</p> <p>Evidence (153)—Parol to Vary Writing—Receipts. A receipt is not a written contract within the rule against parol evidence, and may be explained or contradicted by parol.</p>

Judges: Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.