Skip to main content
· 5/10/1995

Langford v. Ortiz

Citations

  • 654 So. 2d 1237
  • 1995 WL 270568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \that the lower court should have entered a final order on custody\
  • “Rotating custody ... is presumptively not in the best interest of a child.”
  • \Rotating custody... is presumptively not in the best interest of a child.\
  • reversing bi-annual rotation order where the mother lived in North Carolina and the father resided in Florida, finding the requirement that a school age child switch school environments in the middle of the year was not in the child's best interests
  • reversing bi-annual rotation order where the mother lived in North Carolina and the father resided in Florida, finding the requirement that a school age child switch school environments in the middle of the year was not in the child’s best interests
  • listing factors that can overcome presumption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.