Skip to main content
· 6/15/1999

Langford v. Couch

Citations

  • 50 F. Supp. 2d 544
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9174
  • 1999 WL 409390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that inmates seeking monetary relief must still exhaust all remedies, even though these do not provide monetary damages
  • “The . . . PLRA amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.”
  • “[T]he . . . PLRA amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.”
  • “[T]he . . . PLRA amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.”
  • “[T]he . . . PLRA amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.”
  • “[T]he. . . . PLRA amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.