Skip to main content
· 9/9/2003

Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. Phenix Biocomposites, LLC

Citations

  • 668 N.W.2d 438
  • 2003 Minn. App. LEXIS 1129
  • 2003 WL 22078734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts should “avoid an interpretation that would render any part of the contract surplusage or nugatory”
  • indicating that intent can be inferred from actions of parties
  • “If the project were one continuous project, the process of paying off all former liens would likely not have taken place.”
  • “The physical, visible condition, to be determined from an inspection of the premises, is an essential element as part of determining whether a project has been abandoned....”
  • “The physical, visible condition, to be determined from an inspection of the premises, is an essential element as part of determining whether a project has been abandoned.... ” (emphasis added)
  • collecting cases and analyzing the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schumacher, Randall, Kalitowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.