· 9/9/2003
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. Phenix Biocomposites, LLC
Citations
- 668 N.W.2d 438
- 2003 Minn. App. LEXIS 1129
- 2003 WL 22078734
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that courts should “avoid an interpretation that would render any part of the contract surplusage or nugatory”
- indicating that intent can be inferred from actions of parties
- “If the project were one continuous project, the process of paying off all former liens would likely not have taken place.”
- “The physical, visible condition, to be determined from an inspection of the premises, is an essential element as part of determining whether a project has been abandoned....”
- “The physical, visible condition, to be determined from an inspection of the premises, is an essential element as part of determining whether a project has been abandoned.... ” (emphasis added)
- collecting cases and analyzing the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schumacher, Randall, Kalitowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.